Case 2600445/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mr I Olive (2) Mr N Shaw v Taylors Transport Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600445/2021
- Decision date
- 16 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Mr I Olive (2) Mr N Shaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 16 July 2021, Employment Judge Camp found that Taylors Transport Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr I Olive's wages in January 2021 in respect of holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Olive £60.
The tribunal recorded that the rest of Mr Olive's claim failed. It also recorded that Mr N Shaw's claim was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that Mr Olive suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages in January 2021 in respect of holiday pay and ordered payment of £60. | Upheld | — | £60 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr Shaw's claim was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rule 52 of the Rules of Procedure. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £60
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.