Case 2600463/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. A Broadbent v Chinook Energy Europe Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600463/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. A Broadbent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a Rule 52 withdrawal judgment. It records that the proceedings in case number 2600463/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr. A Broadbent, against Chinook Energy Europe Limited.
No findings on liability, remedy, or quantum are recorded. The extracted text does not set out the underlying facts, any legal analysis, or any tribunal decision on the merits of the pleaded claims. The only substantive outcome recorded is dismissal of the proceedings because the claim was withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text does not itemise the pleaded causes of action; it records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The case listing categories identify breach of contract as one of the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text does not itemise the pleaded causes of action; it records only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The case listing categories identify unfair dismissal as one of the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.