Case 2600465/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K de Herder v Saint-Gobain Construction Products Limited t/a Artex — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600465/2019
- Decision date
- 23 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K de Herder
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone, to determine whether Mrs K de Herder met the definition of disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010. The claimant said she had attention deficit disorder and anxiety, and the respondent accepted those were long-term conditions but disputed that they had a substantial effect on her normal day-to-day activities. The judge accepted the claimant's evidence and considered the occupational health reports in the bundle.
Applying section 6 and the 2011 guidance, the tribunal held that the claimant had a mental impairment with a long-term and substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, taking account of the effect without treatment. The judgment recorded substantial effects on cooking, shopping, sleeping, travelling, socialising, and getting to and from work, and noted that the claimant had developed coping strategies and was taking medication.
The tribunal therefore found that Mrs de Herder was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. It did not decide the merits of the pleaded discrimination or dismissal complaints at this hearing. Instead, it identified the issues for the later final hearing, including failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from disability, direct disability discrimination, and constructive unfair dismissal, and listed the final hearing for 15 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal held that the claimant had ADD and anxiety amounting to a disability under section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. It did not determine the substantive discrimination allegations or the constructive unfair dismissal claim at this hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Equality Act 2010 s.6
- Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1 paragraph 5(i)
- 2011 guidance on matters to be considered in determining questions relating to the definition of disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.