Case 2600469/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Curtis v Rolls-Royce plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600469/2024
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Curtis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint against Rolls-Royce PLC. On 23 May 2024 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out, because the Tribunal could not consider such a complaint unless the claimant had two years' or more service and the claimant appeared not to have sufficient service.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims were still listed for hearing on 17 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out by Employment Judge Hutchinson on 31 May 2024 after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 23 May 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.