Case 2600470/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Morley v The Renewal Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600470/2019
- Decision date
- 24 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Morley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Nottingham on 24 July 2019, Employment Judge Brewer recorded that Mr J Morley's claims against The Renewal Trust were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment lists the claims as indirect race discrimination, victimisation, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising, and whistleblowing detriment.
The decision does not set out findings of fact or substantive reasons on the merits. It is a short written record of the procedural outcome only, stating that the claims were withdrawn and therefore dismissed.
The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded in the judgment as indirect race discrimination and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded in the judgment as direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising; both were dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded as whistleblowing detriment and dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.