Case 2600471/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Geoffrey Gershon Williams v Aspire Communications Limited Record of an Attended Hearing at the Employment Tribunal Audio Recorded by CVP — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600471/2024
- Decision date
- 28 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Geoffrey Gershon Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, a Field Sales Account Manager employed by the Respondent (a BT Local Business franchise) from October 2018 until his resignation on 3 November 2023, brought a claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 for unpaid Standard Commission on sales he had made during employment which closed/installed between December 2023 and August 2024. The Respondent's BT Local Business licence was revoked at the end of 2023 and the Claimant did not transfer under TUPE. The contract reserved the employer's right to vary commission terms and stated the Claimant would cease to be eligible to earn commission on termination of employment.
The Tribunal found that the parties had reached a legally binding agreement in early October 2023 under which the Respondent would continue to pay Standard Commission on sales the Claimant had made during employment as and when those sales closed. The Tribunal concluded that subsequent communications, including the 30 October 2023 and 4 December 2023 emails purporting to introduce clawback of previously paid Accelerator Commission, did not validly vary that agreement: any such variation would require clear and unambiguous wording and the Claimant had not accepted it. The contractual commission clause did not extend to permitting clawback of payments already made under an express understanding that they would not be clawed back.
The complaint of unlawful deduction from wages therefore succeeded. The agreed gross sum due was £4,638.57, less an agreed £601.08 annual leave overpayment which the Claimant accepted, producing a net award of £4,037.49 gross. Judge Broughton sat alone; the judgment was signed on 26 January 2025 and sent to the parties on 28 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim brought under s.13 ERA 1996 for unpaid Standard Commission. Awarded sum is the agreed £4,638.57 less an agreed £601.08 annual leave overpayment offset. | Upheld | — | £4,037 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,037
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Birmingham City Council v Wetherill and ors 2007 IRLR 781
- Sheet Metal Components Ltd v Plumridge [1974] ICR 373
- Peninsula Business Services Limited v Sweeney 2004 IRLR 49
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.