Case 2600472/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss JR Cooper v Captain Jack’s Adventure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600472/2022
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss JR Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss JR Cooper’s unfair dismissal claim for lack of jurisdiction. It found that the claim had been presented out of time and that it had not been reasonably practicable for it to be presented within the relevant time limit.
The tribunal also struck out the claimant’s disability discrimination claims for lack of jurisdiction. It held that those claims were presented out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time for their presentation. No monetary remedy was awarded because the claims were not allowed to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time when it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The disability discrimination claims were struck out for lack of jurisdiction because they were presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time for presentation. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.