Case 2600483/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Turner in person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600483/2023
- Decision date
- 7 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Mrs J Rawlins, Mrs H Andrews
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Turner in person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing in Nottingham on 28 and 29 October 2024, before Employment Judge R Clark with Mrs J Rawlins and Mrs H Andrews, the parties agreed terms of settlement. The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The case therefore ended without any merits findings on the underlying unfair dismissal or disability discrimination issues.
The tribunal made no order as to costs. The judgment was sent to the parties on 7 November 2024. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant during the final hearing, following settlement terms agreed between the parties. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant during the final hearing, following settlement terms agreed between the parties. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.