Case 2600483/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Kerry Maxey v Specialist Vocational Training Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600483/2026
- Decision date
- 11 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kerry Maxey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. Employment Judge L Brown decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that Kerry Maxey was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £4,540 in damages. It found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £8,049.75. It also found that Specialist Vocational Training had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded £1,073.30. The total award was £13,663.05, and the hearing listed for 31 July 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,540 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,050 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,073 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,663
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.