Case 2600484/2026 · Employment Tribunal
Ryan Maxey v Specialist Vocational Training Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600484/2026
- Decision date
- 17 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge V Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ryan Maxey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningRyan Maxey presented the claim against Specialist Vocational Training Ltd on 11 October 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge V Butler decided that the claim could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The Tribunal found that Mr Maxey was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,460 in damages. It also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,038.44. The respondent had failed to pay his holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,519.20. The total award was £7,017.64, and the hearing listed for 31 July 2026 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,460 |
| Redundancy | The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,038 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,018
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.