Case 2600493/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Hall v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600493/2019
- Decision date
- 3 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leicester before Employment Judge Brewer on 2 and 3 March 2020. The claimant was represented by counsel and the respondent by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the parties reached a settlement. Following that settlement, the claimant's claims under case number 2600493/2019 were dismissed on withdrawal. No findings on liability or remedy were set out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the parties reached a settlement and that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The unfair dismissal claim type is identified from the listing category, as the judgment text does not separately describe the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the parties reached a settlement and that the claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The working time claim type is identified from the listing category, as the judgment text does not separately describe the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.