Case 2600504/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Leaning v Grimsby Central Hall Trust — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600504/2022
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Leaning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 11 May 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and cancelled future hearings.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £331.84 gross. It also found that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. The judgment recorded no explanation for that failure and no indication of any attempt to comply, and the judge considered four weeks' pay to be a just and equitable award, fixed at £200.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £448.93. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment was £980.77.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £331.84 gross. | Upheld | — | £332 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. It said there was no explanation for the failure or indication of an attempt to comply, and made a just and equitable award of four weeks' pay, fixed at £200. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £448.93. | Upheld | — | £449 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £981
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.