Case 2600522/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Shipman v Investors in Community Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600522/2022
- Decision date
- 19 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Shipman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 17 February 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a Rule 21 determination on the papers. The judgment recorded that the claim succeeded and listed the sums payable to the claimant.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £4,461.54 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,788.46.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,270.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £4,796.15.
The total sum payable under the judgment was £14,316.15. The hearing listed for 17 June 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £4,462 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice; determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,788 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,270 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £4,796 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,316
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,270
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £12,046
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.