Case 2600529/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Moss v Browns (Derby) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600529/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Moss
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment, issued under Rule 21, records that Ms M Moss succeeded on all of the claims set out in the order. The tribunal found that Browns (Derby) Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £250 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,543.84. In addition, it found that she had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,461.52.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,376.10. The hearing listed for 22 July 2021 was cancelled, and the extracted judgment contains no further reasoning beyond these dispositive findings and amounts.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,544 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,462 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,376 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,631
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.