Case 2600531/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Shepherd v Browns (Derby) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600531/2021
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Shepherd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Clark entered judgment under Rule 21 without a hearing listed for 22 July 2021. The tribunal upheld the claimant Mrs J Shepherd's claims against Browns (Derby) Limited for an unauthorised deduction from wages, breach of contract in respect of notice, redundancy pay, and holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £250 gross for the wages deduction claim, £3,686.16 in damages for notice, £9,243.20 as a redundancy payment, and £1,431.32 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The judgment does not record any discrimination issue, liability dispute, or separate legal analysis beyond the Rule 21 default judgment and the individual monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £250. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,686.16. | Upheld | — | £3,686 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £9,243.20. | Upheld | — | £9,243 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,431.32. | Upheld | — | £1,431 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,611
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.