Case 2600541/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Humberstone v Mrs Sharon Gate — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600541/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Humberstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent before Employment Judge Broughton. The tribunal recorded that Mrs Sharon Gate was to pay Mr David Humberstone three agreed sums: £249.82 net for breach of contract described as unpaid notice pay, £1,178.55 gross for unlawful deduction of wages described as unpaid wages, and £798.18 net for holiday pay after deductions for tax and NI.
The judgment does not set out contested findings on liability, witness evidence, or legal analysis beyond recording the parties' consent. No separate award for interest or any additional remedy is recorded, and the decision is limited to the three listed sums. The total of the sums recorded in the judgment is £2,226.55.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £249.82 net for unpaid notice pay. | Settled | — | £250 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £1,178.55 gross for unpaid wages. | Settled | — | £1,179 |
| Holiday pay | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £798.18 net for holiday pay, after deductions for tax and NI. | Settled | — | £798 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,227
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.