Case 2600542/2018 · Employment Tribunal
HELEN WYETH v The British Triathalon Federation — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600542/2018
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
HELEN WYETH
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Adkinson, heard evidence from the parties, reviewed the documents, and heard closing submissions at Leicester on 7, 8 and 9 October 2019. Its written judgment records only one substantive conclusion: the claimant was not dismissed for the purposes of sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Because the tribunal found that there had been no dismissal, the claimant’s constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate remedy assessment, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed within sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the constructive unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.