Case 2600546/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Pawlik, Representative For the v Mr A Graham, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600546/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Pawlik, Representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this attended preliminary hearing on 27 November 2019, Employment Judge Britton sitting alone determined the preliminary issue of disability status under section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on a longstanding back injury following a riding accident, associated left leg symptoms, and depression. The tribunal accepted the medical records, specialist reports, occupational health evidence, the claimant’s impact statement, and her oral evidence, and held that the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of these proceedings.
The judge found that the back and left leg condition had become evident again by January 2016, had continued through 2017 and 2018, and caused more than minor or trivial adverse effects on normal day-to-day activities, including walking, climbing stairs, mobility, and working in physically demanding warehouse roles. The tribunal also found that the depression, treated with antidepressants and counselling, had a substantial and long-term adverse effect, with low mood affecting everyday functioning. Migraine was considered but was not found to amount to a disability on the evidence available.
The judgment does not finally determine any liability claims. Instead, the tribunal noted that the claimant was seeking to pursue or amend claims arising from the later work-assignment changes and directed the parties to exchange further particulars, a schedule of loss, and any response, with a view to possible judicial mediation and a further case management hearing. The tribunal referred to authorities including Goodwin, McNichol, J v DLA Piper, and Richmond Adult Community College in reaching the disability finding.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only; the tribunal determined disability status under the Equality Act 2010 and did not finally adjudicate the underlying merits claims. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v The Patent Office
- McNichol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Limited
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP
- Richmond Adult Community College v McDougal
- Archibald v Fife Council
- Prakash v Wolverhampton City Council
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.