Case 2600547/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Hussain v Derby City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600547/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a judgment by consent in the claim brought by Miss Z Hussain against Derby City Council.
The judgment records that the claim for aggravated damages, the claim for personal injury, and any adjustment to any award pursuant to Section 207A of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 were struck out. No monetary award or further findings are recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes this as the claim for aggravated damages; the locked taxonomy has no specific category for aggravated damages. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment describes this as the claim for personal injury; the locked taxonomy has no specific category for personal injury. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment strikes out any adjustment to any award pursuant to Section 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; this is an adjustment issue rather than a separate claim type in the locked taxonomy. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.