Case 2600550/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Chamberlain v Adaptable Consultancy Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600550/2022
- Decision date
- 1 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Chamberlain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands (East) Employment Tribunal on 18 February 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Hutchinson determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the hearing listed for 1 July 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £540.00. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awarded £290.00. No other remedy components are set out in the judgment, and the total monetary award on the face of the decision is £830.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £540.00 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £540 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awards £290.00 under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £290 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £830
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.