Case 2600558/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Furniss v Steven Foss & Midlands Plastering Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600558/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Furniss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Clark on 6 April 2020 in the case of Mr A Furniss against Steven Foss and Midlands Plastering Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £800.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £86.15. The judgment does not split the award into compensatory or other standard remedies, so the payable sums are recorded as the monetary orders made on each claim.
An application for costs was refused. The tribunal said it was not satisfied that the circumstances of the case engaged the discretion to order costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £86 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £886
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.