Case 2600562/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Rachel Ellis – Lay Representative For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600562/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown REPRESENTATION
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Rachel Ellis – Lay Representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 7 November 2024, Employment Judge L Brown considered the claimant's unfair dismissal claim against Holland and Barratt International under s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal found that the claim had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim under s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.