Case 2600567/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Horton v Mr M Seeman and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600567/2022
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs P Horton
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkinson sat alone at Leicester on 29 September 2022 and heard from the claimant and the respondents. The written record states that, after hearing from both sides, the tribunal concluded that it was just and equitable to extend the time for presenting the claim.
The order made was procedural only: the time in which the claimant could present her claim was extended so that the claim is deemed presented in time. The record does not set out any determination of the merits of the underlying claim, and no remedy was awarded in this document.
The decision also notes that written reasons were requested at the hearing and would follow separately. On the extracted text available here, no further findings are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The only substantive order in the written record is that it was just and equitable to extend time so the claim is deemed presented in time. No underlying liability or remedy decision is recorded in this text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.