Case 2600569/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms AJ Angless v Secretary of State for Business & Trade and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600569/2024
- Decision date
- 29 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms AJ Angless
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard from the claimant and the first respondent. The second respondent was barred from taking part because it had not presented a response.
The Tribunal concluded that the Secretary of State had made a decision on the claimant's application for a payment from the redundancy payments service on 14 February 2024, after which the claimant commenced early conciliation and presented the claim. Having considered Employment Rights Act 1996 section 188, the Tribunal found that the claim was presented within three months of that decision.
The judgment was that the claim was presented in time and that the Tribunal therefore had jurisdiction to hear and determine it. The substantive claim was to proceed in the usual way, with directions to be provided separately.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment determined only that the claim was presented in time and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear and determine it. It did not determine the substantive claims or award any remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 188
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.