Case 2600570/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Anthony Oldham v Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service Record of an attended Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600570/2024
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- East Midlands
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Anthony Oldham
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct after a GIF of a gorilla was sent from his personal Instagram account to a Black colleague. An initial investigation in 2022 ended with the claimant being told the case was closed, but after the colleague brought a grievance in 2023 the respondent reopened the matter, suspended the claimant and dismissed him.
The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. The stated issue was the fairness of reopening disciplinary action almost a year after the claimant had been told the case was closed, and the respondent accepted that the additional evidence could have been available or obtained during the original investigation.
The tribunal also found contributory fault. It concluded that the claimant's failure to respond to two messages from his colleague after learning of the GIF was blameworthy, unreasonable and led directly to the decision to dismiss. The parties were to make further submissions at a remedy hearing on the percentage reduction to the basic and compensatory awards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The liability judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim is well founded and succeeds subject to a finding of contributory fault. Remedy was reserved for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- band of reasonable responses
- Iggesund Converters Ltd v Lewis 1984 ICR 544, EAT
- Section 122(2) ERA
- Section 123(6) ERA
- Steen v ASP Packaging Ltd 2014 ICR 56, EAT
- Sanha v Facilicom Cleaning Services Ltd EAT 0250/18
- Nelson v BBC (No.2) 1980 ICR 110, CA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.