Case 2600571/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Hullait v Prime Life Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600571/2022
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Hullait
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant’s allegations or arguments that Prime Life Limited indirectly discriminated against her because of religion or philosophical belief. It recorded that a preliminary hearing on 21 February 2023 had resulted in an order for the claimant to pay a £500 deposit, and that the order was sent to her on the same day.
The claimant failed to pay the deposit. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the indirect religion or belief discrimination allegations or arguments under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment states that the remaining claim would proceed to hearing, but it does not identify that remaining claim in this extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The claimant was ordered to pay a £500 deposit after a preliminary hearing on 21 February 2023. The tribunal recorded that the deposit was not paid and struck out the allegations or arguments under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.