Case 2600577/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Preston v Meggitt Polymers & Composites — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600577/2018
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Preston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Swann recorded on 8 August 2019 that the proceedings in case numbers 2600577/2018 and 2602820/2018 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The extracted judgment text does not contain any findings on liability, credibility, remedy, or compensation, and it does not identify any substantive legal analysis beyond the disposal on withdrawal.
No award was made. The text also does not list lay members or any other panel composition, so the decision is treated as judge-alone on the extracted material.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate merits findings are stated. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate merits findings are stated. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.