Case 2600579/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented. For the v Boneham & Turner Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600579/2024
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge R Clark sitting alone at Nottingham on 6 January 2025. The listed purpose was to decide whether Mr Law met the definition of disabled at the material time, to consider strike out or deposit order applications, and to make any necessary case management orders. Mr Law did not attend and was not represented. The tribunal clerk attempted to contact both Mr Law and his representative, Ms Cheryl Brown, by telephone and email, but no response was received.
The judge stood the matter down until 11.45 a.m. because of possible travel difficulties, but no contact was made. When the case was called again at about 11.55 a.m., the judge concluded that some aspects of the case still required further information from the claimant. The respondent's application was granted and the claimant's claims were dismissed in their entirety under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The judgment does not record any merits findings on the underlying pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not enumerate the pleaded claims individually. It records dismissal of the claimant's claims in their entirety under rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.