Case 2600585/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. W Roche v Allestree Woodlands School — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600585/2019
- Decision date
- 28 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. W Roche
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment in case 2600585/2019, between Mr W Roche and Allestree Woodlands School, dated 28 June 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. The text provided does not contain separate findings on the individual complaints beyond that overall outcome. It also states that the hearings listed on 02/08/19 and 06-08/07/2020 are cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment is a short Rule 21 judgment and states only that 'the claim succeeds' and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim in the text provided. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment is a short Rule 21 judgment and states only that 'the claim succeeds' and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim in the text provided. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.