Case 2600585/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Poulton v Shaw Trust Limited (The) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600585/2022
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
- Panel members
- Ms A Srivastava, Ms R Wills
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Poulton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leicester Hearing Centre on 9 and 10 May 2023, with deliberations on 11 May 2023, heard from the claimant in person and from counsel for the respondent. Its unanimous judgment was that all claims were dismissed.
The written judgment does not set out the tribunal’s factual findings or legal reasoning. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Outcome is explicit in the judgment. Claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category because the judgment text only states that all claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Outcome is explicit in the judgment. Claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing category because the judgment text only states that all claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.