Case 2600592/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Reid v Burton Same Day Couriers Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600592/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Reid worked for Burton Same Day Couriers Limited as a van driver from 1 October 2015. He said he handed in one week's notice on 21 December 2018 and was told to leave there and then, handing over the van, keys and fuel cards. The respondent did not attend the hearing, and Employment Judge Hutchinson proceeded in its absence after considering the claimant's oral evidence and documents including his contract, handbook, payslips and a later solicitor's letter.
On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that Mr Reid had lawfully given one week's notice and was entitled to be paid that notice period. It held that the respondent did not require him to work his notice after taking the vehicle and keys from him and telling him he was not required to work. Using the payslips, the judge calculated an average weekly take-home pay of £330.45 and awarded that sum as damages for notice pay.
On the unlawful deduction claim, the tribunal accepted Mr Reid's evidence that there was no term in his contract or the company handbook authorising deductions, and that he had not agreed in writing to any deduction. It rejected the respondent's ET3 assertions that his normal take-home pay was £258.20 and that a £320 deduction had been made under a deductions policy. The judge found that Mr Reid had not known about the alleged fines or other sums until the respondent's solicitors wrote on 18 April 2019, and was not satisfied that he owed the respondent any money at the end of his employment. The tribunal held that the non-payment of the final week's wages amounted to an unlawful deduction and ordered payment of £330.45 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded in respect of one week's notice pay after the tribunal found the claimant had lawfully given notice and had been sent home rather than required to work it. | Upheld | — | £330 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for the net final week's pay; the tribunal found there was no contractual deductions term or written consent and rejected the respondent's asserted deductions policy and figures. | Upheld | — | £330 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £661
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.