Case 2600595/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Courtney Trusswell v Ilkeston Trading Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600595/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Courtney Trusswell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 24 February 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The claimant's application to amend her claim was granted.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £548.40 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £266.86 in damages.
The tribunal further found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and awarded £138.47 gross. It also found a failure to provide written particulars of employment and ordered payment of £579.20 gross. The total award was £1,532.93, and the hearing listed for 15 July 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £548.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £548 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £266.86. | Upheld | — | £267 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £138.47 gross. | Upheld | — | £138 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment and awarded £579.20 gross. | Upheld | — | £579 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,533
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.