Case 2600598/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J W Butler v Welton Aggregates Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600598/2024
- Decision date
- 9 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. J W Butler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Heap struck out the claim in a judgment dated 9 September 2024. The reasons state that by a letter dated 28 August 2024 the tribunal gave Mr J W Butler an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 8 May 2024 and because the claim was not being actively pursued.
Mr Butler did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate out substantive findings for this claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out after non-compliance with the order dated 8 May 2024 and no response to the tribunal's letter dated 28 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separate out substantive findings for this claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out after non-compliance with the order dated 8 May 2024 and no response to the tribunal's letter dated 28 August 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.