Case 2600602/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr EB v Department for Work and Pensions — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600602/2022
- Decision date
- 3 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Non-legal
- Venue
- Nottingham
- Panel members
- Mr A Beveridge, Mr C Bhogaita
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr EB
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that the claimant’s claims of direct race discrimination and wrongful dismissal (notice pay) were not well founded and dismissed both claims. The decision records the hearing at Nottingham before Employment Judge M Butler with two non-legal members, Mr A Beveridge and Mr C Bhogaita, and notes that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
An anonymity order was made in favour of the claimant and also for the individual who raised a grievance against him, who is identified in the judgment as Miss JH. The extract provided records the disposal and procedural orders, but no monetary award was made because both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.