Case 2600606/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M. Jowett v Midland Lettings Limited Record of an Attended Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600606/2025
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M. Jowett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Broughton, sitting alone, held that the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. The claimant, formerly a Property Portfolio Manager employed since February 2021 (with employment transferred to the respondent under TUPE in April 2023), resigned with immediate effect on 18 October 2024 in response to a series of acts she said amounted to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction of wages under s.13 ERA 1996, but awarded no compensation in respect of that finding. All remaining claims (breach of contract, holiday pay deduction, failure to make pension contributions, and a claim for injury to feelings for breach of trust and confidence) were not well founded and were dismissed; in particular, applying Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd and subsequent authority, the tribunal held that this was not an exceptional case warranting damages for distress arising from breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £5,200 in respect of the constructive unfair dismissal claim, comprising a £2,100 basic award and a £3,100 compensatory award (£2,600 loss of earnings net plus £500 loss of statutory rights). The recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal upheld. Basic award £2,100; compensatory award £3,100 (loss of earnings £2,600 net + loss of statutory rights £500). Recoupment provisions do not apply. | Upheld | — | £5,200 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction of wages under s.13 ERA 1996 found, but no compensation awarded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Remaining claims (breach of contract for unpaid dividend/salary causing increased tax, holiday pay deduction, failure to make pension contributions, injury to feelings for breach of trust and confidence) dismissed as not well founded. PDF text truncated at 15,000 of 87,337 chars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,200
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,100
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,100
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
12 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Addis v Gramophone Company Ltd [1909] AC 488
- Mahmud v BCCI [1998] AC 20
- Bliss v South East Thames Regional Health Authority [1987] ICR 700
- French v Barclays Bank plc [1998] IRLR 646
- Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] ICR 702
- Watts v Morrow [1991] 4 All ER 939
- Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd [1973] QB 233
- Heywood v Wellers [1976] QB 446
- Gogay v Hertfordshire CC [2000] IRLR 703
- Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.