Case 2600607/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Holmes v Adaptable Consultancy Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600607/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Wilson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Holmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by an Order dated 27 November 2022, and again by a letter dated 9 September 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to confirm that he had obtained the consent of the Administrator or permission of the court to allow the claim to proceed against the respondent. The reasons state that the claim had previously been stayed to enable the claimant to obtain that permission.
The Tribunal noted that the claimant had been given previous strike out warnings. Because he did not comply with the earlier Order or the later letter, the Tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive merits decision or remedy award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the reasons. It records that the claim had been stayed while the claimant sought permission to proceed against the respondent and was then struck out for non-compliance with the Order dated 27 November 2022 and the subsequent letter dated 9 September 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.