Case 2600611/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jason Shemwell and others v RSL Distribution Limited and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600611/2022
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Navdip Wilson
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Jason Shemwell and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Navdip Wilson sitting alone at Nottingham on 25 October 2022, dealing with a multiple claim brought by Mr Shemwell and five other claimants against RSL Distribution Limited, Adaptable Logistics and Stoneport Group Limited. The respondents had failed to present a valid response in time and did not attend; the Tribunal determined the matter under the Rules of Procedure. Claims against Adaptable Logistics were stayed under a separate Order as that respondent is in administration.
The Tribunal found that the claimants' ACAS Early Conciliation notifications in respect of notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay against RSL Distribution Limited and Stoneport Group Limited were made outside the limitation period, and those claims were dismissed as out of time. Mr Shemwell withdrew his unfair dismissal and redundancy pay claims, and Mr Kemp withdrew his holiday pay and notice pay claims; those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
On redundancy pay, the Tribunal found that Mr Bough, Mr Egginton, Mr Filbee and Mr Kemp had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and were each entitled to redundancy payments from RSL Distribution Ltd and/or Stoneport Group Limited of £1,632, £13,056, £4,080 and £7,344 respectively. Mr Greenhough did not attend and the Tribunal was unable to determine his claim; it will write to him separately. Future hearings were cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claims for notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay against RSL Distribution Limited and Stoneport Group Limited dismissed as out of time: ACAS EC notifications were outside the limitation period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claims against RSL Distribution Limited and Stoneport Group Limited dismissed as out of time. Mr Kemp's holiday pay claim also dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claims against RSL Distribution Limited and Stoneport Group Limited dismissed as out of time. Mr Kemp's notice pay claim also dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Mr Bough was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,632 from RSL Distribution Ltd and/or Stoneport Group Limited. | Upheld | — | £1,632 |
| Redundancy | Mr Egginton was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £13,056 from RSL Distribution Ltd and/or Stoneport Group Ltd. | Upheld | — | £13,056 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,112
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.