Case 2600625/2025 · Employment Tribunal

1. Alina Jafri 2. Edna Serwaa 3. Aaryan Mayor 4. Rawand Hassan 5. Katie Almond 6. Daniel Laryea-Goldsmith v Michael Wisher Ltd (Creditors voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2026

Case reference: 2600625/2025
Decision date: 18 June 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge V Butler

Indexed: 17 July 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

1. Alina Jafri 2. Edna Serwaa 3. Aaryan Mayor 4. Rawand Hassan 5. Katie Almond 6. Daniel Laryea-Goldsmith

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claims brought by Alina Jafri, Edna Serwaa, Aaryan Mayor, Rawand Hassan, Katie Almond and Daniel Laryea-Goldsmith. The judgment does not specify the causes of action within those claims.

The Tribunal had written to the claimants on 19 February 2026 warning that it was considering strike-out under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claims appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimants did not reply, request a hearing, attend the preliminary hearing that day, explain their absence, or confirm an intention to pursue their claims.

Employment Judge V Butler was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that strike-out accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3. No monetary remedy was recorded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment strikes out the claim but does not identify the specific causes of action adjudicated.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.