Case 2600637/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr David Kushner v D & M Haulage Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) AT A FINAL HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600637/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr David Kushner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 7 September 2023 in Lincoln, before Employment Judge Clark sitting alone, the claimant appeared in person and the respondents did not attend or take part. The tribunal noted that the respondent had failed to enter a response and that it accepted the claimant's evidence of earnings and losses.
The tribunal found that Mr David Kushner was unfairly dismissed on 3 March 2023. It also found that he was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment, although that payment had already been satisfied by the Redundancy Payments Service in the sum of 5787. On the evidence accepted by the tribunal, it awarded 2407.86 for unfair dismissal compensation, made up of four weeks' loss of net wages to 31 March 2023 and loss of employer pension contributions for that period.
The tribunal also awarded 1285 for 2.2 weeks of accrued but untaken annual leave outstanding at termination, and a further 1142 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because, at the date of presentation of the claim form, the respondent had not provided a written statement of the main terms of employment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed on 3 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £2,408 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment, but that payment had already been satisfied by the Redundancy Payments Service in the sum of 5787. | Upheld | — | £5,787 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded compensation for 2.2 weeks of accrued but untaken annual leave at termination, calculated as 2.2 x 584.09. | Upheld | — | £1,285 |
| Other | At the date the claim form was presented, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of the main terms of employment, and the tribunal made an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,142 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,835
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,408
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.