Case 2600640/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Newman v Solutions4health and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600640/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs C Newman
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Newman transferred from the NHS to Solutions4health on 1 April 2016 under TUPE. Her salary increased from £22,769.60 to £22,996.80 in April 2017. The judgment records that her separate breach of contract claim had already been withdrawn on 27 July 2020 because she remained employed by R2.
The main claim concerned alleged unlawful deductions from wages arising from the 2018 Agenda for Change pay award. The tribunal held that, applying Alamo v Heron and regulation 4A of the TUPE Regulations 2006, Mrs Newman could not rely on the later 2018 collective agreement against R1 because R1 had not participated in those negotiations. The tribunal also reviewed section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as the governing provision.
The tribunal then considered whether R1's communications created a contractual variation promising the 2018 increase. It found the relevant emails and letter were not sufficiently certain and were conditional on funding being obtained from NHS Pay, so there was no clear offer and no variation of contract. The first strand of the unlawful deduction claim therefore failed.
On the second strand, the tribunal found Mrs Newman had been paid throughout at the rate of £22,996.80. The apparent shortfall after her transfer to R2 was explained by the pay reference and pay date change, and the £600 advance was repaid over three months at £200 per month. That strand also failed, and the unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed in full.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on withdrawal on 27 July 2020 because the claimant remained employed by R2 and could not pursue a breach of contract claim while still employed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal treated this as two strands: alleged unpaid increments after the 2018 Agenda for Change pay deal and an alleged shortfall after transfer to R2/pay-date change. Both strands failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 4A TUPE Regulations 2006
- Alamo v Heron
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.