Case 2600644/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. P Zaman v KH Beauty Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600644/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. P Zaman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs P Zaman brought a claim against KH Beauty Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). The judgment records that the complaint of discrimination relying on the protected characteristic of sex was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. It also records that the claim was issued on 24 March 2023 and that the Respondent did not present a valid response on time.
Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer had already determined that liability could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £126.72. The judgment does not set out any further split of that figure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of discrimination relying on the protected characteristic of sex was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the net sum of £126.72. | Upheld | — | £127 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £127
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.