Case 2600654/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Uzupa v Smokers Lutterworth Limited (T/a Smokers Smokehouse And Bar) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600654/2020
- Decision date
- 10 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Uzupa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Clark issued this Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr K Uzupa against Smokers Lutterworth Limited. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £749.14 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £442.30 for breach of contract in respect of notice, £300 for breach of contract in respect of agreed compensation for cancellation of a holiday outstanding at termination, and £176.92 for unpaid holiday entitlement.
The judgment records no further substantive findings beyond those four monetary awards. It also states that the hearing listed for 10 June 2020 was cancelled. The total amount ordered in the judgment was £1,668.36.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £749 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice on dismissal. | Upheld | — | £442 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of payments agreed as compensation for cancellation of a holiday outstanding at termination. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £177 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,668
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.