Case 2600657/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ugwuogbu v Clear Crystal Consultancy Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600657/2023
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 25 March 2023 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 14 July 2023 was cancelled.
On the substance, the tribunal upheld two monetary claims. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £873.10 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay outstanding expenses incurred in the course of employment and ordered payment of £138.60 net by way of breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £873.10 gross. | Upheld | — | £873 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid outstanding employment expenses and ordered payment of £138.60 net by way of breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £139 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,012
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.