Case 2600659/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Ms J E Webster (2) Mrs A Hossack (3) Miss M Pye (4) Ms L Leishman (5) Miss T Masters v Serendib Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600659/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Ms J E Webster (2) Mrs A Hossack (3) Miss M Pye (4) Ms L Leishman (5) Miss T Masters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Camp gave judgment under Rule 21 on 19 August 2019 and recorded that all five claimants' claims succeeded. The tribunal made awards to Ms Webster, Mrs Hossack, Miss Pye, Ms Leishman and Miss Masters for the heads of claim set out below.
Ms Webster received a £1,233 basic award and £5,709.23 compensatory award for unfair dismissal, plus £353.60 for accrued but untaken annual leave; her wrongful dismissal notice-pay claim was assessed at £0 because any notice element was subsumed within the unfair dismissal compensatory award. Mrs Hossack received a £1,350 basic award and £400 compensatory award for unfair dismissal, £600 notice pay after obtaining further employment and mitigating her losses, and £459.84 for annual leave. Miss Pye received £258.30 notice pay and £537.26 annual leave compensation. Ms Leishman received a £1,826.50 basic award and £400 compensatory award for unfair dismissal, £562 notice pay on the same mitigation basis, and £57.39 annual leave compensation. Miss Masters received a £1,085.19 basic award and £9,366.76 compensatory award for unfair dismissal, with separate notice pay of £0 because that element was subsumed within the unfair dismissal compensatory award.
Claims and outcomes
13 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Ms Webster: basic award £1233 and compensatory award £5709.23. | Upheld | — | £6,942 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Ms Webster: notice pay of £0 because any award for notice pay was subsumed within the unfair dismissal compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Working time regulations | Ms Webster: compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £354 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mrs Hossack: basic award £1350 and compensatory award £400. The judgment states a total of £2,809.34, although the itemised figures listed sum to £2,809.84. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Mrs Hossack: notice pay of £600, described as two weeks' gross pay because she obtained further employment after two weeks and mitigated her losses. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Working time regulations | Mrs Hossack: compensation for accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £460 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Miss Pye: notice pay of £258.30. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,199
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £5,495
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £15,876
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.