Case 2600665/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Williams v M Bradbury Plumbing, Heating & Mechanical Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600665/2023
- Decision date
- 14 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer heard the remedy judgment at Nottingham via CVP on 14 July 2023. The claimant, Mr K Williams, appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was barred following a Rule 21 judgment.
Upon the default judgment issued on 6 July 2023, the tribunal held that the claimant was owed two weeks' wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,208.38, subject to the usual tax and deductions. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning beyond the remedy outcome.
The tribunal also stated that the claimant was not entitled to any pay in respect of holidays or pension entitlements. No additional monetary award was made for those items.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upon the default judgment issued on 6 July 2023, the tribunal ordered payment of two weeks' wages, subject to the usual tax and deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,208 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that the claimant was not entitled to any pay in respect of holidays or pension entitlements. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,208
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.