Case 2600688/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Vaughan v Carl Wright Haulage and Plant Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600688/2020
- Decision date
- 20 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Vaughan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment in favour of the respondent, Carl Wright Haulage and Plant Ltd. It recorded that by letter dated 12 August 2020 the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal order sent on 02 June 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The hearing listed for 3 September 2020 was vacated. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 after the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing following the letter dated 12 August 2020. The reasons given were non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 02 June 2020 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.