Case 2600692/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. D Lisle v DHL Ecommerce Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600692/2024
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. D Lisle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy orders sent to the parties on 4 September 2024, Employment Judge Ahmed gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that no written representations were made and no hearing was requested.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim; it is a case-management outcome based on failure to actively pursue the proceedings.
The hearing listed for 13, 14 and 15 July 2026 was vacated. The judgment was sent to the parties on 30 September 2024 and is signed by Employment Judge Heap.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. It records only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.