Case 2600698/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Adaptable Consultancy Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600698/2022
- Decision date
- 15 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that by letter dated 5 June 2024 the claimant had been given an opportunity to confirm whether consent had been obtained from the Administrator or permission from the court to allow the claim to proceed against the respondent in administration, and was warned that failure to respond within 14 days could result in strike out without further notice.
The Tribunal noted that the claimant had also not complied with an earlier order of Employment Judge Wilson dated 27 November 2022. In light of that non-compliance and the failure to respond to the 5 June 2024 letter, the Tribunal found that the claim had not been actively pursued and ordered that it be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. The claim was struck out because the claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's 5 June 2024 letter asking whether consent from the Administrator or court permission had been obtained to proceed against a respondent in administration, and because the claimant had not complied with an earlier order dated 27 November 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.