Case 2600704/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bonshor v Reality Plus UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600704/2025
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Bonshor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 18 June 2025. The respondent, Reality Plus UK Limited, failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge L Brown recorded that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds. It does not identify the underlying legal heads of claim in the extracted text, and it does not record any substantive findings on liability beyond the rule 22 default position.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It states only that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and the tribunal proceeded under rule 22. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.