Case 2600711/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Chudasama v Mine and Yours Ltd (In liquidation) and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600711/2021
- Decision date
- 6 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mrs R Chudasama
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an attended open preliminary hearing on 25 March 2022 before Employment Judge Ahmed sitting alone in Leicester, the tribunal considered the respondents' grounds of resistance, the witness statement of Simran Kareer, the claimant's representations, and the respondents' response forms filed that day. It found that it was in the interests of justice to extend time for all four respondents to submit their responses to 19 July 2021 and to extend the time for formal completion of the response form to 25 March 2022.
The tribunal set aside the Rule 21 judgment made on 5 July 2021 and sent to the parties on 6 July 2021, and granted all respondents leave to defend the proceedings. It listed the full merits hearing for 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 January 2023 at the Leicester Hearing Centre, and also listed a preliminary hearing by telephone on 25 May 2022. No substantive discrimination or unfair dismissal liability was decided at this hearing, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was an attended open preliminary hearing. The tribunal did not determine any substantive liability claim; it extended time for the respondents' response, set aside the Rule 21 judgment dated 5 July 2021, and gave all respondents leave to defend. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 20
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.